Even more, the conflict that supposes its payment with the use of resources to guarantee the respect of the human rights enshrined in the Constitution, as well as in international pacts and conventions, is omitted. Despite the evidence regarding these two mobile phone number list points (illegality and conflict with other rights), heterodoxy is limited to accepting debt restructurings under the precept that "it was the best that could be achieved." The 2020 and 2021 negotiations advanced during the most serious crisis of the last century, always in the interest of closing an agreement and paying.
When will it be considered opportune to discuss the mobile phone number list continuity of this outflow of foreign currency, if not in a catastrophe of this magnitude? Paying debt or enabling foreign investments that are aimed at sustaining the type of international insertion that already exists do not seem to be ways out of this mess. Second, actually existing actors are circumvented in the reasoning.
By betting on the current international insertion as mobile phone number list a platform for growth, the structural position of the current business elite is reinforced, the same one that concentrates more and more production; the leadership that finances the deficit of the entire economy with its surpluses, but at the same time controls exports and remits foreign currency abroad in the form of flight and profits, while generating little employment. This nucleus of economic power controls an important proportion of the production generated in the country (around a third). How is the clear transnational bias of this business leadership compatible with the objectives of national development?